No. 15 · 5–1 (3–1 SEC)

Kentucky

Wildcats · Away
AT
3–2 (1–1 SEC)

Oklahoma

Sooners · Home
Saturday, Oct. 17, 20267:30 PM ET / 6:30 PM CTGaylord Family Oklahoma Memorial Stadium · NormanSEC NetworkOklahoma −6.5 · O/U 43.5

The call

Oklahoma brings the best unit on the field and a night crowd in Norman. Kentucky brings the steadier quarterback, the stronger ground game, and road-proven nerve. The separation is smaller than the spread.

Projected final
24—17

Oklahoma 24 · Kentucky 17 — Sooners by seven

Oklahoma’s pass defense is the best unit on the field, and it plays at home, at night, against a Kentucky offense that managed 17 points versus Alabama and converts 27% of its third downs. The Sooners’ pass rush attacks a line allowing 2.0 sacks a game, and the SEC’s best third-down and red-zone defense should turn Kentucky’s trips into field-goal attempts — where Sandell’s walk-off pedigree and 53-yard range carry more weight than Zouagui’s shakier most-recent outing. Kentucky’s path is real: Mateer has struggled behind a decimated line, and UK’s opportunistic secondary faces a quarterback with multiple giveaways. But Kentucky’s own defense (28.0 points allowed per game, a leaky third-down and red-zone profile) with five defenders out gives Mateer his softest matchup in weeks. Expect a grinder: OU’s defense or special teams sets up one short field, Sandell connects from deep, and Kentucky’s late rally falls a score short.

Why it lands there

  1. 01OU’s pass defense vs Minchey. SEC-best pass yardage, third-down and red-zone defense, fewest first downs allowed in the FBS — against a Kentucky offense that stalled (17 pts) against its only other elite defense. OU’s path to winning comfortably is forcing Kentucky’s first multi-turnover game of the season — and its takeaways finally showed up against Texas.
  2. 02Kentucky’s broken money downs. The Wildcats rank 122nd in third-down defense and 121st in red-zone touchdown rate allowed, with five defenders out. Even the nation’s 120th-ranked scoring offense can reach the low 20s at home against that.
  3. 03The trench inversion. Three Oklahoma starting offensive linemen are doubtful against Kentucky’s pressure front — the team that leads the SEC in defensive pressures. If that front dominates, this becomes a field-position grind; UK’s clearest path to an upset is living in Mateer’s lap all night.
  4. 04Turnover momentum vs turnover margin. On the season it’s a rout for Kentucky (+3 estimated to ≈ +7; Oklahoma 0 to −4, sources conflict on exact margins). But momentum flipped last week — OU forced two interceptions (one returned for a touchdown) against No. 1 Texas, while Minchey has thrown one interception all year. Whichever version shows up likely decides the game.
  5. 05Kicking in a low-total game. Sandell’s 53-yard range and walk-off confidence versus Zouagui’s two misses last week; with a 43.5 total, every kick is a swing play.
69.2%Dimers win probability: Oklahoma
32.1%ESPN: Kentucky upset chance
−6.5Spread: Oklahoma (covers, barely)
41Projected points: Under 43.5
Confidence: Medium (both source previews). Against the spread: Oklahoma covers −6.5 (barely). Total: Under 43.5 (41 projected points). · Dimers via Courier-Journal; ESPN; odds via Bleacher Nation / FanDuel per A Sea of Blue.

Season snapshot

KentuckyOklahoma
Total offense414.2 yds/g321.3 yds/g
Points scored34.7/g (one source; ≈27.0/g through 5 games per another)23.0/g (120th)
Rushing offense181.8 yds/g (48th)95.8 yds/g (132nd–133rd)
Points allowed28.0/g (6 games; 26.8/g through 5, pre-LSU)17.6/g (28th)
Rush defense135.8/g (57th; 144.2/g, 76th, pre-LSU per another source)115.5–116.8/g (38th)
Pass defense232.4/g allowed (104th); 57.4% comp. (32nd)150.0/g allowed (7th)
Turnover margin+3 (estimated) / ≈ +7 — sources conflict0 / −4 (116th) — sources conflict
Kentucky defensive ranks partly through 5 games (pre-LSU). Full discrepancy notes in Sources & caveats.

Game context: Oklahoma’s first SEC home game of 2026; Kentucky’s first trip to Norman since 1980. Venue capacity 86,112. Forecast: high 50s, 0% chance of rain at kickoff. Series: 4th meeting — OU won 29–8 in Lexington (1982) and 29–7 in Norman (1980); Kentucky’s only win was the 1951 Sugar Bowl. Kentucky is in Year 1 under head coach Will Stein.

Position by position

Each offense is matched against the defense it will actually see. Both source previews’ reads are merged into every card — where they disagreed, the card is marked contested. Filter by position group, or scan all eight.

Kentucky QB vs Oklahoma pass defense

Oklahoma · clear
Kenny Minchey
Comp.67.4% (120 or 128 of 178 — sources differ)
Yards / att.1,394 · 7.8
TD–INT11–1 (fewest INT by an SEC starter)
Rating152.1
Third downUK offense converts 26.9%
Sooners coverage
Pass yds allowed150.0/g (7th)
Third-down D23.1% pre-Texas (SEC best)
Red-zone DSEC best
First downs allowed64 — fewest in FBS
InjuryStarting CB Eli Bowen out

Read: Both sources agree — an elite unit against a good-not-great passing game. Kentucky managed 17 points against the only other elite defense it faced (Alabama). Minchey, who has four games of 250+ passing yards, has not faced a pass defense like this, and OU’s takeaways finally showed up against Texas.

Covers; Sooners Wire; Bleacher Nation; capperspicks; SI; A Sea of Blue

Oklahoma QB vs Kentucky pass defense

Kentucky · slight
John Mateer
Comp.~66.4–66.7% (derived; sources differ on attempts)
Yards / att.1,038 · ~6.8–7.7
TD–INT8–4
Rating151.0 (one source; unconfirmed by another)
Under pressure45 pressures in first 4 games
Rushing53 att, 70 yds, 1.3 ypc, 1 TD, 2 fumbles — well below career standard
Wildcats coverage
Pass yds allowed232.4/g (104th)
Comp. allowed57.4% (32nd)
Yds / att. allowed6.1 (30th)
INT forced6–7
InjuriesNickel Jaden Smith, CB Grant Grayton out

Read: Push, leaning Kentucky. The efficiency lines are nearly identical (152.1 vs 151.0) — the separator is ball security: Minchey’s lone interception against Mateer’s multiple giveaways (4 INT, 2 fumbles). UK’s pass defense is statistically poor but opportunistic, and Mateer has been turnover-prone under constant pressure. Counter: Mateer was turnover-free in the Texas upset (18/26, 155 yds).

Wikipedia 2026 team pages; Courier-Journal; A Sea of Blue; SI; Sportradar; Sooners Wire

Kentucky RBs vs Oklahoma front

Oklahoma · slight
Wildcats ground game
Rush yds / game181.8 (48th)
CJ Baxter484 yds · 5.6 ypc · 8 TD (questionable)
Jason Patterson361 yds · 7.7 ypc
Jovantae Barnes (ex-Sooner)140 yds · 6.1 ypc
Sooners run defense
Rush yds allowed / game115.5–116.8 (38th)
SP+ defenseNo. 2 before Georgia game; 5th in defensive PPA
FormFront keyed the Texas upset

Read: Oklahoma, slight. UK’s run game is its offensive identity, but this front is sturdy enough to test Baxter even if he plays. The swing factor is Baxter’s status: he is a game-time decision with reported optimism he plays (On3 / Pete Nakos); if he is limited, Kentucky leans on Patterson against the 38th-ranked run defense. Baxter’s recent lines: 19/123/2 TD vs LSU, 19/87/2 at Texas A&M, 13/48/1 at South Carolina.

Covers; Sooners Wire; Bleacher Nation; capperspicks; puntandrally; On3

Oklahoma RBs vs Kentucky front

Kentucky · moderate
Sooners ground game
Rush yds / game95.8 (132nd–133rd)
Line yards / success135th nationally in both
Lloyd Avant236 yds · 2 TD (10/72/1 vs Texas)
DepthXavier Robinson out; Tory Blaylock probable
Wildcats run defense
Rush yds allowed / game135.8 (57th; 144.2, 76th, pre-LSU)
Yds / carry allowed4.2 (86th)
Rush TD allowed9 (105th)
Sacks13 (2.2/g)

Read: Kentucky. Oklahoma’s ground game is essentially non-functional as a unit — the offense’s weakest link — and Kentucky’s front is healthier than its back seven. The fits: UK’s run defense is the leakier unit, so if Oklahoma runs at all in this game, this is why. Explosive-run rates (10+/20+ yard carries) and yards-after-contact figures were not available by team.

Covers; Sooners Wire; Bleacher Nation; capperspicks; LouisianaSports.net; puntandrally

Kentucky WR/TE vs Oklahoma secondary

Oklahoma · narrow
Wildcats receivers
Kenny Darby401 yds · 3 TD (12/96/1 vs South Carolina; 4/79 vs LSU)
DJ Miller5/96 vs Texas A&M
Nic Anderson32-yd TD vs South Carolina (probable)
TEsWillie Rodriguez, Mikkel Skinner, Henry Boyer
X-factorBrock Coffman — 55-yd punt-return TD vs LSU
Sooners secondary
UnitElite coverage; fewest first downs allowed in the country
Held Texas in check—
InjuriesStarting CB Eli Bowen out; DB Jacobe Johnson out (Trystan Haynes starts again)

Read: Oklahoma. Kentucky’s receivers have not faced a pass defense this stingy — a committee group with a true freshman lead target against the SEC’s best third-down and red-zone pass defense.

A Sea of Blue; SI; Courier-Journal; UK Athletics

Oklahoma WR/TE vs Kentucky secondary

Contested
Sooners receivers
Isaiah Sategna III25 rec · 331 yds · 2 TD (team lead)
TE Rocky Beers22 rec · 284 yds · 2 TD
DepthTrell Harris out; Parker Livingstone doubtful (6 rec, 51 yds)
Wildcats secondary
INT forced6–7 (11th nationally)
Third-down D46–47% allowed (122nd)
Red-zone TD rate75% allowed (121st)
InjuriesNickel Jaden Smith, CB Grant Grayton out; LBs Antwan Smith, Tavion Wallace out
Read — the sources disagreed:
  • Kentucky-source view: Push. Both units are depleted; Sategna is Oklahoma’s only proven separator, and Kentucky has interceptions on the year despite the poor efficiency ranks.
  • Oklahoma-source view: Oklahoma. The nickel loss makes the Beers matchup materially harder to cover, and UK’s secondary is the weakest link by the injury report — the 122nd-ranked third-down defense and 121st-ranked red-zone TD rate are this game’s softest spot for Mateer.
Bleacher Nation; LouisianaSports.net; Puntandrally; Courier-Journal

Kentucky OL vs Oklahoma DL

Contested
Wildcats protection
Sacks allowed2.0 per game
Run production181.8 rush yds/g behind the line
QB kept cleanMinchey: 1 INT all season
Sooners pass rush
Sacks15 in 5 games (3.0/g) per one source; ≈10 estimated from game reports per another
RoleThe engine of the defense / top-30 scoring defense
Read — the sources disagreed:
  • Kentucky-source view: Oklahoma. The pressure rate (3.0 sacks/g vs 2.0 allowed) is the single biggest mismatch on this side of the ball.
  • Oklahoma-source view: Kentucky. UK’s ground production and a clean pocket for Minchey all season point the other way — the rush hasn’t been graded as the dominant force on tape.
Covers; Bleacher Nation; Sportradar; capperspicks

Oklahoma OL vs Kentucky DL

Kentucky · moderate
Sooners protection
StatusDecimated: three starters doubtful
Fasusi / Pierre-Louis / OzaetaDoubtful (Friday report)
Fred HintonQuestionable
Projected lineTrue freshman Noah Best at LG; Fodje LT, Joseph RG, Harris RT, Miakkula C
Mateer pressurePressured 45 times in first 4 games
Wildcats pressure
Sacks13 on the season (2.2/g)
PressuresLeads the SEC in pressures (hurries + hits + sacks)
LeaderMi’Quise Humphrey-Grace leads the team in sacks
InjuriesDE Tyler Thomas out (downgraded Thursday); DT Kalen Edwards questionable

Read: Kentucky — even-to-Kentucky on the conservative read. UK’s best path to holding OU under 20 is winning up front against backups. The counterweight: DE Tyler Thomas is out, thinning the SEC’s top pressure unit on the exact week it most needed to overwhelm.

On3/KSR; Sooners Wire; News9; SEC availability reports

Possession pressure

Ball security is Kentucky’s single biggest edge in this game — the Wildcats protect it and take it away, and they commit the fewest penalties in the SEC. The two source previews agree on the direction but publish conflicting exact margins; both are carried here with their labels.

Kentucky margin+3 / ≈+7

Estimated vs +7 per sources — see note

Oklahoma margin0 / −4

116th nationally per one source — see note

Kentucky takeaways6–7 INT

Forced interceptions (sources differ on count)

Oklahoma takeawaysINT vs UGA & 2 vs Texas

Bowen 42-yd pick-six; Guillory INT

What remains open: one source has Kentucky at +3 (estimated — fumble lost/recovered splits were not fully verified) and Oklahoma at 0 (6 giveaways: 4 INT + 2 fumbles; 6 takeaways: 3 INT + 3 fumble recoveries). The other has Kentucky at ≈ +7 (0.8 giveaways/g, 2.0 takeaways/g) and Oklahoma at −4 (116th nationally), with ~3 lost fumbles. Both agree Minchey has thrown 1 interception (tied fewest in the SEC) while Mateer has thrown 4 plus 2 fumbles (2 lost fumbles at Georgia; Sategna 1 lost vs New Mexico). Minchey also lost 1 fumble vs Alabama. The takeaway drought broke for Oklahoma against Texas: two interceptions, including the pick-six, plus a blocked-punt touchdown (Danny Okoye block, Dakoda Fields recovery). Kentucky’s non-offensive score: Brock Coffman’s 55-yard punt-return TD vs LSU — its first since 2021.
Covers; capperspicks; Courier-Journal; Sooners Wire; Puntandrally; LouisianaSports.net; NBC Sports; soonersports.com

Field goals & field position

In a game with a 43.5 total, the kicking edge matters. Zouagui has been steadier week to week, but Sandell — the reigning Lou Groza winner — has the best long-range ceiling in this game and just hit a walk-off winner against the No. 1 team in the country. Punting cannot be compared fairly: only single-game gross/net samples are available for either team. The sources conflict on Oklahoma’s season field-goal line; both versions are carried.

Oklahoma · Tate Sandell (5th yr)

5/8–5/962.5% / 55.6%
Long 53 · Groza winner
Field goals5/9 (55.6%) per one source; 5/8 (62.5%) per another
Long53 (two makes); 9 career makes from 50+ in two seasons
Pedigree2025 Lou Groza Award winner; 24/27 in 2025, incl. 8/9 from 50+
PAT12/12 this season; 47/47 across two seasons at OU
Recent form47-yard walk-off winner vs No. 1 Texas (hit from 53, missed from 53 in that game); SEC Special Teams Player of the Week
Punting — Jacob Ulrich48.8 avg on 6 punts vs Georgia (45.5 net, game sample)
Return / blockBlocked-punt TD vs Texas
Sooners Wire; Pro Football Network; soonersports.com; On3; Sportradar

Kentucky · Adam Zouagui (Davidson transfer)

8/1172.7%
Long 52
Field goals8/11 (72.7%)
Long52 (at Texas A&M)
PAT24/24
PedigreeWon the job after Jacob Kauwe’s summer injury
Recent form2/4 vs LSU — missed from 42 and 26, then made the game-tying 33-yarder with 12 seconds left; 2/2 vs South Carolina (42, 29); 1/2 at Texas A&M
Punting — Wilson Berry3 punts, 40.3 avg vs LSU (35.0 net, game sample); starts again; Thomas O’Hara punted earlier in the season
Return / coverageCoffman 55-yd punt-return TD vs LSU
Sooners Wire; Kentucky game reports in research notes; A Sea of Blue; ukathletics.com

Injury report

Union of both source previews, drawn from the SEC availability reports as of Friday, 10/16. Final inactives come ~90 minutes before kickoff — especially Baxter and the three Oklahoma linemen.

Oklahoma

PlayerPosStatusMatchup impact
Michael FasusiOL (starter)Doubtful (Friday)High — part of a three-starter OL crisis against Kentucky’s pressure front; Ryan Fodje stays at left tackle in the projected lineup
Eddy Pierre-LouisOL (starter)Doubtful (Friday)High — interior protection for a QB already pressured 45 times in four games; true freshman Noah Best projected to start at left guard
Heath OzaetaOL (starter)Doubtful (Friday)High — if all three sit, OU starts a near-wholesale backup line (Peyton Joseph at RG; E’Marion Harris at RT; Jake Miakkula at C)
Eli BowenCB (starter)Out (ruled out Friday; was questionable Wed/Thu)High — the elite pass defense loses a starting corner; Trystan Haynes starts again
Taylor HeimLBOutMedium — front-seven depth against Kentucky’s three-back rotation
Jacobe JohnsonCB/DBOutMedium — secondary depth behind the Bowen absence
Trell HarrisWROutMedium — more weight on Sategna and Beers in an already thin receiver room
Xavier RobinsonRBOutLow-medium — Avant and Blaylock carry the load; the run game is already last-tier nationally
Parker LivingstoneWRDoubtfulMedium — minimal 2026 production (6 rec, 51 yds), but depth matters with Harris out
Trynae WashingtonTEOutLow — thins the TE rotation behind Beers
Fred HintonOLQuestionableMedium — further offensive-line depth concern
Tory Blaylock / Jack Van DorselaerRB / TEProbableLow — both expected to play

Kentucky

PlayerPosStatusMatchup impact
CJ BaxterRB (lead back)Questionable — game-time decision; reported optimism he playsHigh — the swing injury of the game. 484 yds, 8 TD, 5.6 ypc; 123 yds and 2 TD vs LSU last week. Without him, Kentucky leans on Patterson (7.7 ypc) and Barnes against the 38th-ranked run defense
Antwan SmithLBOutMedium-high — thins the second level against OU’s short passing game
Tavion WallaceLBOutMedium-high — a second linebacker out compounds the Smith absence
Jaden SmithNickel/DBOutMedium — slot coverage against Sategna and the Beers matchup gets harder to cover
Grant GraytonCB/DBOutMedium — secondary depth is already the defense’s weak point
Tyler ThomasDEOut (downgraded Thursday)Medium — thins the SEC’s top pressure unit against the exact opponent it most needed to overwhelm
Alex Afari Jr.LBQuestionableMedium — his availability would soften the linebacker losses
Kalen EdwardsDT/DLQuestionableMedium — interior depth against OU’s backup linemen is exactly where UK needs to win
Elijah BrownTEQuestionableLow — depth behind Boyer (and Rodriguez/Skinner)
Nic Anderson / Hasaan SykesWR / DBProbableLow — both expected to be available (Anderson: 32-yd TD vs South Carolina)

Net assessment: Oklahoma’s injury burden is heavier and lands on its weakest unit — the offensive line — directly across from Kentucky’s biggest defensive strength, its pressure front. Kentucky’s losses are concentrated in front-seven and secondary depth. Baxter’s status is the single biggest variable: if he sits, OU’s run defense gets a far easier assignment.

SEC availability reports (final Friday update) via Sooners Wire, News9, Stormin’ in Norman, On3/KSR, The Oklahoman

Ball placement & rushing upside

Where premium tracking metrics were unavailable, the analysis uses clearly labeled proxies rather than pretending the missing numbers exist.

89%

Minchey’s adjusted completion vs Texas A&M (2 drops)

The only adjusted accuracy figure available for either quarterback; Mateer has none. The QB comparison therefore uses completion %, yards per attempt, and TD/INT as proxies: Minchey 67.4% (120 or 128 of 178 — sources differ) for 1,394 yards and 7.8 Y/A against Mateer’s ~66.4–66.7% for 1,038 yards and ~6.8–7.7 Y/A. Minchey is the more efficient and far more careful passer — an 11:1 TD-to-INT ratio, the SEC’s joint-lowest interception total. The counterweight is the opponent: OU’s pass defense (7th nationally) is a tier above anything Minchey has faced. Edge: Kentucky.

Puntandrally; Wikipedia 2026 team pages; UK Athletics; UK Wildcats Wire. Minor source discrepancies on Minchey’s completions are flagged in Sources & caveats.
  • No public on-target or adjusted completion rates were found for either team season-long; Mateer’s accuracy can only be proxied. Minchey: 23/36, 246 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT vs LSU; 28/41, 272 yds, 3 TD vs South Carolina; 14/18, 252 yds, 2 TD at Texas A&M. Mateer: 18/26, 155 yds, 0 TD, 0 INT vs No. 1 Texas (turnover-free); 25/34, 231 yds, 2 TD but 2 lost fumbles at Georgia.
  • Kentucky’s ground game (edge: Kentucky, moderate) is the real thing: 181.8 rush yds/g (48th) with Baxter, Patterson and Barnes all averaging 5.6+ per carry. Baxter’s game-time decision is the swing variable — optimism he plays per On3’s Pete Nakos.
  • Oklahoma’s ground game is the offense’s weakest link: 95.8 rush yds/g (132nd–133rd) and 135th in both line yards and rushing success rate. Avant flashed vs Texas (10/72/1, season-long 42-yard run); Mateer’s legs have been a non-factor.
  • Line-play proxy: sacks allowed and sacks generated; public line-yards and TFL-allowed splits were unavailable. Kentucky’s 13 sacks (2.2/g) vs Oklahoma’s ~10 estimated from game reports (15 in 5 games per another source).
  • Explosive-run proxy: none published — explosive-run rates (10+/20+ yard carries) and yards-after-contact figures were not available by team this week.
Covers; Bleacher Nation; Puntandrally; LouisianaSports.net; A Sea of Blue; On3; Sportradar

Sources & caveats

Statistics are a dated snapshot through Week 6, compiled October 17, 2026 (game day). Injury status, starting lineups and betting lines can change before kickoff. Source names are listed as text; no links were invented.

  1. SEC availability reports (final Friday update)Injury statuses via Sooners Wire, News9, Stormin’ in Norman, On3/KSR, The Oklahoman.
  2. Bleacher NationLine and moneyline (10/14); Oklahoma team ranks; odds via FanDuel per A Sea of Blue.
  3. Covers.comTeam statistics and matchup analysis.
  4. capperspicksTeam statistics.
  5. puntandrallyTeam and player statistics; Minchey and Kentucky yardage figures.
  6. LouisianaSports.netKentucky defensive figures through 5 games (Oct. 5).
  7. Courier-JournalDimers model (69.2% OU, ~25–19); Mateer/Minchey context; INT figures.
  8. A Sea of BlueIndividual stats and game reports; odds context.
  9. SIIndividual and team stats.
  10. NBC SportsTurnover and game context.
  11. On3 / Pete Nakos; On3/KSRBaxter game-time-decision optimism; Kentucky injury context.
  12. Wikipedia 2026 team pagesSeason team and player stats.
  13. UK Athletics (ukathletics.com); soonersports.comOfficial team sites.
  14. KyKernelKentucky scoring figures through 5 games.
  15. Pro Football Network; SportradarKicking figures; Mateer game-by-game lines.
  16. ESPN; DimersKentucky 32.1% upset chance; win probability and projected score.

Known discrepancies between the two source previews

  • Turnover margins conflict: one source has Kentucky +3 (estimated — fumble lost/recovered splits not fully verified) and Oklahoma 0; the other has Kentucky ≈ +7 (0.8 giveaways/g, 2.0 takeaways/g) and Oklahoma −4 (116th nationally). Direction agrees (Kentucky advantage); exact margins do not.
  • Kentucky team totals conflict: 414.2 total yds/g and 34.7 pts/g per one source vs ~347 total yds/g (KyKernel) and ~27.0 pts/g through 5 games per another; points allowed 28.0/g (6 games) vs 26.8/g (5 games, pre-LSU); rush defense 135.8/g (57th) vs 144.2/g (76th, pre-LSU).
  • Minchey’s season line varies: Wikipedia lists 128/178 for 1,394 yards; Puntandrally lists 120/178 for 1,394 (67.4% in both).
  • Oklahoma field goals conflict: 5/9 (55.6%) vs 5/8 (62.5%) — both cite a 53-yard long.
  • Oklahoma season sack total conflicts: 15 sacks in 5 games (3.0/g) per one source vs ~10 estimated from game reports per another.
  • Moneyline conflict: Kentucky +195 vs +205 (Oklahoma −250 in both).
  • Minor rank/format conflicts: Oklahoma rushing offense 132nd vs 133rd; Kentucky takeaways 6 vs 7 interceptions forced; Oklahoma rush defense 115.5 yds/g (pre-Texas) vs 116.8 yds/g; Mateer Y/A ~6.8 vs 7.7 (derived); passer rating 151.0 vs not confirmed; Mateer rushing 70 yds (1.3 ypc) vs 69 yds (2.7 ypc, through 3 games).
  • Data gaps: no PFF-style adjusted completion %, on-target rate, or deep-ball accuracy for either QB (89% vs Texas A&M is the only adjusted figure); net punting averages unavailable for either team; explosive-run rates and yards-after-contact unavailable; Oklahoma defensive yardage (238 yds/g, 5th) is a pre-Texas snapshot; Kentucky yards per play estimated at ~6.0; South Alabama–Kentucky result reported as 45–21 by one source but not located in the other’s research (treated as a Kentucky win on the 5–1 record).
  • Live availability: statuses reflect the Friday 10/16 SEC availability reports. Saturday updates and the 90-minute pregame inactives list — especially Baxter and the three Oklahoma linemen — could move the projection.