Position by position
Each offense is matched against the defense it will actually see. Filter by position group, or scan all eight. Where the two source reads agreed, that edge stands; where they disagreed, the card is marked Contested.
Missouri QB vs Ole Miss pass D
Missouri · slightAustin Simmons (ex–Ole Miss)
Comp. / Y/A64.8% · 8.7
Yards / TD–INT1,434 · 14–1
Rating / QBR164.6 / 71.5 (36th)
Ole Miss coverage
Pass yds / att allowed7.5 (93rd FBS)
Joseph (S)OUT — tightrope ankle procedure
Preston (S)Questionable; McCoy (S) OUT
Read: Simmons' downfield aggression vs a depleted secondary is Mizzou's clearest passing path. But his 1 interception understates the risk: roughly three passes vs Mississippi State and Texas A&M "probably should've been intercepted" (Red Cup Rebellion).
sports-reference.com · Saturday Index (throw charts) · Red Cup Rebellion · SEC availability reports
Ole Miss QB vs Missouri pass D
Ole Miss · slightTrinidad Chambliss
Comp. / Y/A70.1% (3rd SEC) · 8.2
Yards / TD–INT1,435 · 11–4
QBR / total off.83.0 (14th) / 309.6 ypg (8th)
Missouri coverage
Pass yds / att allowed6.6 · 224.2 ypg (90th)
Sacks (T-3rd SEC)18*
Woodyard Jr. (LB)43 tackles, 1 INT — will play
Read: Chambliss is the best QB Missouri has faced; his anticipation and quick release (46% of throws travel 0–9 yards) blunt the pass rush. His 6 giveaways (4 INT, 2 fumbles) keep the Tigers live.
Ole Miss official game notes · sports-reference.com · SEC availability reports · *18 per Clarion Ledger (Oct 16); 15 per therebelwalk (Oct 15) — conflict flagged
Missouri RBs vs Ole Miss front
Missouri · strongJamal Roberts
Carries / yards147 · 828 (5.6/carry)
After contact673 yds — leads the nation
Recent211 yds (3 TD) vs Fla; 222 (2 TD) vs A&M
Ole Miss front
Rush yds allowed176.4/g (104th FBS)
YPC allowed4.3 (86th)
3rd-down defense45.9% (123rd)
Read: The game's clearest mismatch: Missouri's best ground game meets Ole Miss' weakest unit, with Hardy (out) and Fonoti (out) removing any change of pace — Roberts (147 carries) carries the full load. Ole Miss counters with volume through the air, not the ground.
sports-reference.com · thegruelingtruth.com via Heavy · Clarion Ledger · SEC availability reports
Ole Miss RBs vs Missouri front
Missouri · strongOle Miss rushing
Yards / game133.2 (105th FBS)
Yards / carry4.4 (73rd)
Lacy / Frazier230 yds, 5 TD / 153 yds, 5.1 ypc
Missouri front
Rush yds allowed78.5/g (8th)
YPC allowed2.4 (5th)
Rodriguez (LB)63 tackles — leads the FBS
Read: Missouri's best unit vs Ole Miss' weakest — the Rebels' ground game is their softest spot. Caveat: the one dynamic offense Missouri faced (Mississippi State) beat them; Troy, Kansas and Texas A&M were subpar attacks. Lacy (ex-Missouri) is off the report with a rushing TD in 13 straight games, and the short passing game substitutes for the run.
sports-reference.com · Red Cup Rebellion · Clarion Ledger · SEC availability reports
Missouri WR/TE vs Ole Miss DBs
Missouri · slightPrimary targets
Lee (ex–Ole Miss)42 rec · 616 yds · 5 TD (probable)
Olugbode26 rec · 407 yds · 6 TD (team high)
Norfleet (TE)Questionable — upgraded from doubtful
Ole Miss DBs
Joseph / PrestonOUT / Questionable
Kite / ClardyBoth probable
Vs Vanderbilt4 takeaways forced
Read: Vertical talent plus two transfers who know the building, aimed at a secondary down two safeties. Gavin Hoffman is out for Missouri; Hayden Bradley is questionable for Ole Miss.
sports-reference.com · SEC availability reports · The Rebel Walk
Ole Miss WR/TE vs Missouri DBs
Ole MissPrimary targets
Alexander32 rec · 503 yds · 5 TD (100.6 ypg, 13th FBS)
Ray / Fields17-231 / 17-190
Odom (TE)17-230
Missouri DBs
Pass defense224.2 ypg allowed (90th)
TacklingSound; Rodriguez leads FBS in tackles
Safety shuffleBanner probable, Blair out
Read: The best receiving corps Missouri has seen; the short-game scheme attacks the soft spots underneath. Missouri's INT total is ~6 (sports-reference team table) but 4 per team notes — discrepancy flagged.
Ole Miss official game notes · sports-reference.com · SEC availability reports
Missouri OL vs Ole Miss DL
ContestedMissouri protection
Yds / play6.4 (31st)
Sacks allowedNot publicly confirmed*
Personnel2 OL out; C Cayden Green probable
Ole Miss pressure
Team sacks9 total — quiet front
Perkins1.5 sacks · 1.5 TFL
TFL totalOnly partial data confirmed
Read — contested: The Missouri-side source reads this as a Missouri edge: Ole Miss hasn't generated pressure, so Mizzou should have time for deep routes. The Ole Miss-side source reads it even: Ole Miss' pass rush is a weakness, but Missouri is down two offensive linemen (Atkins, Canty Jr.) leaning on a probable Green. *Missouri's sacks-allowed figure was not found publicly.
sports-reference.com · SEC availability reports · Clarion Ledger
Ole Miss OL vs Missouri DL
Even — strength on strengthOle Miss protection
Sacks allowed5 total — 1st in SEC, 17th FBS
LT Terez Davis"Playing elite football" (Golding)
OL depthWangoy/Chapman/Faulkner OUT; starters intact
Missouri pressure
Team sacks18 (T-3rd SEC)* — 3+ in five straight
Hopkins (EDGE)7.0 sacks · 7 TFL · 2 FF
Webb (DT)Game-time decision (Thamel)
Read: Slight Missouri if Hopkins wins vs Davis; Ole Miss has protected Chambliss all year. Webb's interior pressure is Missouri's best shot at cracking that protection — his absence would soften the matchup.
Ole Miss official game notes · SEC availability reports · *18 per Clarion Ledger (Oct 16); 15 per therebelwalk (Oct 15) — conflict flagged